Optus senate inquiry Full video

On November 8, 2022, a major telecommunications outage impacted millions of Optus customers across Australia. Lasting over 12 hours, the network failure prevented Optus subscribers from making phone calls, accessing the internet, and reaching emergency services. In the aftermath, Optus faced massive public criticism over its handling of the crisis and lack of transparency. On November 17, Optus executives including CEO Kelly Bayer Rosmarin testified before a Senate committee as part of an official government inquiry into the outage. The Optus senate inquiry Full video of the Senate proceedings provided new details about what occurred behind the scenes at Optus and revealed shortcomings in the company’s contingency planning. This article will analyze key revelations from the Optus Senate inquiry full video regarding the outage timeline, the company’s crisis response, impact on emergency services, compensation issues, accountability questions, and steps needed to rebuild public trust. Following veneziabeachv.vn !

Optus senate inquiry Full video
Optus senate inquiry Full video

I. Optus Senate Inquiry Full Video


The Australian telecommunications company Optus faced intense scrutiny following its major network outage on November 8, 2022. With millions of customers impacted by the disruption, Optus came under fire for its handling of the crisis. The company’s response raised concerns about contingency planning, public communication, leadership accountability, and service reliability.

When testifying at the Senate inquiry into the outage, Optus CEO Kelly Bayer Rosmarin admitted the company’s performance was inadequate but claimed steps were taken to rectify shortcomings. However, Optus was criticized for only releasing two brief public statements during the initial 10 hours of the meltdown. With frustration mounting, Optus declined to hold a press conference or have its CEO directly address the public. This poor communication during the crisis added further damage to Optus’ reputation.

The Senate inquiry also revealed Optus paid only $36,000 in compensation so far to impacted consumers. They claimed restoring network functionality was the priority over larger payouts. But with inadequate compensation offered, public outrage persisted over Optus’ response. The company faces long-term challenges rebuilding customer trust.


The Australian Senate launched an inquiry into the November 8th Optus network outage to investigate the causes and examine the company’s handling of the disruption. With millions impacted across the country, the Senate inquiry provided government oversight into the telecom failure.

In mid-November, Senate committee hearings were conducted featuring testimony from Optus executives like CEO Kelly Bayer Rosmarin. By holding an official inquiry, the Senate facilitated public accountability for Optus. The full video of proceedings increased transparency around internal decisions made during the outage.

Pointed questioning from Senators at the inquiry highlighted issues like Optus’ lack of communication, failure to safeguard emergency service access, and reluctance toward comprehensive compensation. While Optus claimed to take steps to address shortcomings, the Senate inquiry illustrated that more was required to satisfy the public.

By leveraging its investigative powers, the Senate inquiry compiled evidence regarding how one company’s network failure could impact society and the economy nationwide. The proceedings will inform political debates over improving telecom industry resilience and emergency response plans.


The Australian Senate launched an official inquiry consisting of committee hearings and an investigatory report focused on analyzing the causes and impact of Optus’ November 2022 network outage.

By using its parliamentary inquiry powers, the Senate could compel Optus executives like CEO Kelly Bayer Rosmarin to provide testimony on oath before the committee. This allowed detailed public questioning of Optus leadership regarding decisions made during the outage.

The Senate inquiry had a broad mandate to examine both technical and communication factors underlying the disruption. Senators scrutinized Optus’ network infrastructure, redundancy safeguards, crisis response protocols, public messaging, and compensation policies.

By publishing the full video of proceedings, the inquiry provided unique transparency around Optus’ actions during the outage. The CEO and other leaders had to clarify timeline details, outage impacts, restoration priorities, and contingency limitations.

While faulting Optus, the Senate also used the high-profile inquiry to assess Australia’s telecom sector dependencies and reliability gaps. With communication networks increasingly essential, the inquiry report will likely recommend updated regulations and standards to improve resilience.

Full Video

The Australian Senate took the significant step of publishing the full video of proceedings from its inquiry into the Optus network outage. By making the hours of testimony freely available online, unprecedented transparency was achieved regarding the company’s internal response.

The video provided new insights through moments like Optus’ CEO explaining they had no specific plans to manage an outage of this scale. Viewers could see senior leaders face tough questioning about communication deficiencies and accountability.

Releasing the full Senate inquiry video supported public understanding of the factors involved in a massive telecom failure. People could view firsthand how Optus made decisions during the crisis and what challenges existed.

For Optus, the public video added scrutiny to their outage preparations and handling. But it also gave them a unique opportunity to acknowledge shortcomings transparently and clarify their outage timeline. The video will ultimately aid future analysis of crisis management and infrastructure resilience.

Overall, the Senate inquiry video highlighted Optus’ mistakes but also demonstrated an accountable government process examining how to enhance telecom reliability. By shedding light on the outage’s causes and impacts, the video can now educate stakeholders across the industry.

II. Optus’ Poor Communication During the Outage

A major theme emerging from the Optus Senate inquiry full video was the company’s failure to provide timely, transparent communication during the outage itself. While network disruptions are inevitable, Optus did not deliver adequate updates to impacted consumers which compounded frustration.

In the first 10 hours of the outage, Optus only released two brief public statements via their social channels. As millions of subscribers lost service, they received minimal information from Optus. With confusion and anger mounting, Optus declined to hold a press conference or media briefing with their CEO to provide a substantive update.

Kelly Bayer Rosmarin admitted in her testimony that Optus’ public communication during the outage was lacking. With an event of this massive scale, the majority of affected customers got virtually no information from Optus as the outage dragged on. The inability to publicly convey the issues, keep consumers updated, and set appropriate expectations reflected poorly on the company.

Optus ultimately failed to grasp the need for transparent, regular communication during a nationwide crisis. As a telecommunications leader, Optus should have recognized the importance of visible leadership, media presence, and continuous updates. The Senate inquiry video laid bare the deficiencies in Optus’ communication during the outage itself.

III. The Outage’s Impact on Emergency Services

Another alarming revelation from the Senate inquiry was the extent to which Optus’ network failure impacted emergency services. Over 200 calls to 000 emergency lines were unable to get through due to the outage according to testimony.

With the outage occurring at peak commuting hours on a Tuesday morning, the number of Australians affected by an inability to reach emergency services was substantial. Traffic accidents, medical events, fires, and crime do not halt because of a telecom failure.

Yet Optus’ lack of a contingency plan for a total outage left emergency call centers crippled at a time of likely need. The new details about emergency service disruptions illuminated how severely public safety was compromised.

Optus rightfully faces criticism for not prioritizing 000 access as part of its outage response. The Senate video makes clear that secondary communication methods for emergency services should be a key focus for Optus and the telecom industry going forward. No Australian should have their safety jeopardized because a provider’s network goes down.

IV. Optus’ Behind the Scenes Response to the Outage

While Optus’ public communications during the outage appeared lacking, the Senate inquiry video also shed light on what was occurring internally. According to the timeline outlined by executives, Optus was not idle as the crisis unfolded.

After becoming aware of the outage around 7:30am, Optus CEO Kelly Bayer Rosmarin rushed to the network operations center and convened an emergency meeting. By 8:32am, four and a half hours after the outage began, she contacted the Minister for Communications. Optus also communicated with multiple government agencies as well as state and federal officials throughout the day.

However, details remain unclear regarding when Optus fully realized the breadth and consequences of the outage. When exactly did they know emergency calls were blocked? How quickly could they diagnose the root technical causes? The behind-the-scenes timeline illustrates Optus actively responding but still seems to raise transparency questions.

While Optus worked feverishly to restore network functions, their priorities and internal communications should face scrutiny to improve future outage preparations. The Senate video makes evident that Optus’ internal crisis processes need refinement to match the response that Australians expect from their telecom provider.

Please note that all information presented in this article has been obtained from a variety of sources, including wikipedia.org and several other newspapers. Although we have tried our best to verify all information, we cannot guarantee that everything mentioned is correct and has not been 100% verified. Therefore, we recommend caution when referencing this article or using it as a source in your own research or report.
Back to top button